The person i chose is michael from section U1S. His strong points derive from the fact that he really likes the song and is passionate about the song. He states that there are more points to the song then just standing up against " the Man" but also about freedom of speech. He makes a claims of definition when he makes an interpretation of several lines in the song. He is also historically correct when he mentions the beginning of the explicit language stickers that the government put to try to disgrace music in the 1980's, which actually helped the music bacome popular. His weakness is that the analysis was very short. I feel he could have put more into the analysis such as giving a really brief history. Like when the song came out, what album was it one, and how far did it go on the Billboard Charts.
If i were to give him a grade i would say B- because he made good points, but it was really short.
No comments:
Post a Comment